This is a UAP shot with a film camera. However, since no one has succeeded in shooting UAP yet, is it impossible to prove? Or rather, no one has seen it? Even in the US military, the main body has not succeeded yet, just by shooting the shadow of UAP.
********************************************** The history of science is the history of alchemy, and the history of lies is also ww So can't you trust it until you confirm it yourself? Did you confirm the existence of UAP by leaving it on the film? Well, even in the US Navy, it's only monochrome shooting, so ww color shooting may be the first time in history?
"Experiment" ... Real UAP image, {UFO, UA SNS of groups and individuals who saw P, research, etc.} Stick it on and see the reaction. Progress to the present …… Almost no reaction www Is it so brainwashed by the media?
**********************************************
Image usage fee US $ 100 Amazon Gift Code
*********************************************
UAP is always wrapped in force field, so it is difficult to shoot w Even with the US Navy Top Gun, even if you say "I see it almost every day", when I look at the image, there is a lot of out-of-focus w At the angle of the sun , The moment the main body was miraculously seen through, I was able to shoot ww
Did the Pentagon's UAP-approved, alien search make sense? In other words, aliens do not come to the earth, are they only monitoring with UAP probes?
/////////////////////////////////////////////////
"Members of the UAP Task Force are having a hard time getting cooperation from the Air Force." ... So far, only the U.S. Navy and the Pentagon have acknowledged the UAP phenomenon? UAP report from the U.S. Air Force Is there no case? My camera is $900. Still, I will take a picture so far. US Air Force cameras cost $900,000. What kind of UFO have you photographed? ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
Early satellites could not avoid persistent cloud cover. Similarly, UFOs are hidden behind persistent cloud cover. However, in daylight, the entity can sometimes be seen through.
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ UFOs are difficult to see with the naked eye, but film cameras are sensitive to the infrared region, so they can be photographed. UFOs usually travel in the infrared region. And you can see the body in the magnetic force field. ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ In the age of film cameras, UFOs could be photographed, Is it no longer possible to shoot UFOs with digital cameras? That's because digital cameras are equipped with powerful IR cut filters. ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。
UFOs operate in the electromagnetic domain, invisible to the human eye. Older cameras can capture the infrared region, which is part of that electromagnetic spectrum.
。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。
UFOs are difficult to see with the naked eye, In the age of film cameras, UFOs could be photographed, Is it no longer possible to shoot UFOs with digital cameras? That's because digital cameras are equipped with powerful IR cut filters.
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ Infrared light has the characteristic of being easier to pass through the spatial absorption band than visible light, so it is effective for grasping UFOs hidden behind it.
The reason why unidentified flying objects cannot be photographed well with a digital camera is that they have a strong infrared cut filter. Film cameras can shoot well because they don't have it.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ by the way・・ When the camera was still in the analog era Kodachrome film came out w I knew there was ... There was no film scanner. To be exact, There was no equipment that could color scan Kodachrome ww Recently ... At Amazon, a low-priced film scanner costs about 10,000 yen ... ww Even though it is a low-priced version, is it the same as the equipment for about 300,000 yen? Kodachrome is also properly color-corrected.
In that Kodachrome, #UAP and #UFO But found ww When I shot it, I only thought about the moon in the daytime ... However, the color development is random ... Epson scan, when enlarged ... UFO is clear ... ww When I search on the net again ... I can't find the same type of UFO at all ww ++++++++++++++++++++++++
########
Vintage photos are mostly monochrome, with very few color prints.
In the case of color, it will be faded after 30 years. Therefore,
I made organic pigments as color formers. Moreover, the dot type will be the world's first.
########
For my printing technique The material of silk printing is being used for my printing technique. Material is waterproof paper, a sensitization agent, acetic acid vinyl, Y.M.C.K. pigments, etc. With an ultraviolet ray exposure machine, about eight sheets are exposed using a long-tone or short tone film etc. from one sheet, and development processing is carried out only with water. It is very easy.
# This, analog pigment print method, # From shooting the film, inverted, creating a positive film ...
Thank you for coming here. Gum prints can be easily made by those who have done monochrome photography. Please make it by all means. Thank you.
My blog is simple and rudimentary. I just copy the ivy content in one place to another blog. for example,
https://magicmoon2007.blogspot.com/
The composition is YOUTUBE video link, original photo, Three points of the original text. ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ UAP experiment Part 1. Is it real if UFO researchers react to real UAP images? Mostly fake and government-intentioned? ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
Most of the self-proclaimed UFO researchers are fake w Or rather, are you obsessed with the government? The rationale is real UAP photos, and if you retweet, most of them are unresponsive. Because they have never seen real UAPs or photos ww ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
My blog is simple and rudimentary. I just copy the ivy content in one place to another blog. for example, https://cafevoice.wordpress.com/ https://magicmoon2007.blogspot.com/
The composition is YOUTUBE video link, original photo, Three points of the original text. ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ UAP experiment Part 1. Is it real if UFO researchers react to real UAP images? Mostly fake and government-intentioned? ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
Most of the self-proclaimed UFO researchers are fake w Or rather, are you obsessed with the government? The rationale is real UAP photos, and if you retweet, most of them are unresponsive. Because they have never seen real UAPs or photos ww ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
The concept of vintage printing is already ww It's because digital pigment prints came out. That is, an original print is input to a personal computer, and a digital print is outputted as a finished product. Still, the original print is a worthwhile ww ######################
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ UFOs are difficult to see with the naked eye, but film cameras are sensitive to the infrared region, so they can be photographed. UFOs usually travel in the infrared region. And you can see the body in the magnetic force field. ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ In the age of film cameras, UFOs could be photographed, Is it no longer possible to shoot UFOs with digital cameras? That's because digital cameras are equipped with powerful IR cut filters. ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。
UFOs operate in the electromagnetic domain, invisible to the human eye. Older cameras can capture the infrared region, which is part of that electromagnetic spectrum.
。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。
UFOs are difficult to see with the naked eye, In the age of film cameras, UFOs could be photographed, Is it no longer possible to shoot UFOs with digital cameras? That's because digital cameras are equipped with powerful IR cut filters.
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ Infrared light has the characteristic of being easier to pass through the spatial absorption band than visible light, so it is effective for grasping UFOs hidden behind it.
The reason why unidentified flying objects cannot be photographed well with a digital camera is that they have a strong infrared cut filter. Film cameras can shoot well because they don't have it.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
The concept of vintage printing is already ww It's because digital pigment prints came out. That is, an original print is input to a personal computer, and a digital print is outputted as a finished product. Still, the original print is a worthwhile ww ######################