|
2024Miraculous photos &UFO
  #UAP in Spain 1995 Minolta Alpha Camera-Kodachrome film* The UFO was called #Flying Saucer, but this UAP is probably a #Flying Cup, no matter how you look at it. At the bottom of the object, a layer of atmosphere like a force field is formed. # UAP The actual color of the UAP shot on Kodachrome film is unknown. This is because older scanners do not analyze Kodachrome. #UAP announced by the US Department of Defense A 35mm reversal image taken more clearly and three-dimensionally? Is it metallic and has a hollow structure in the center? A streak pattern can be seen on the body of the object. https://youtu.be/y0i-PLDyMBQ Obtained a higher resolution image than the UAP image announced by the US Department of Defense. If you analyze it a little more, you can expect new information.       +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ by the way・・ When the camera was still in the analog era Kodachrome film came out w I knew there was ... There was no film scanner. To be exact, There was no equipment that could color scan Kodachrome ww Recently ... At Amazon, a low-priced film scanner costs about 10,000 yen ... ww Even though it is a low-priced version, is it the same as the equipment for about 300,000 yen? Kodachrome is also properly color-corrected. In that Kodachrome, #UAP and #UFO But found ww When I shot it, I only thought about the moon in the daytime ... However, the color development is random ... Epson scan, when enlarged ... UFO is clear ... ww When I search on the net again ... I can't find the same type of UFO at all ww +++++++++++++++++++++ PR   Modern pictures are completed with digital data on the computer.One-ness Classical technique photography consists of an amalog camera, film, and finally on paper #-X-76 https://youtu.be/3rNDeKmWt_U  #UAP in Spain 1995 Minolta Alpha Camera-Kodachrome film* The UFO was called #Flying Saucer, but this UAP is probably a #Flying Cup, no matter how you look at it. At the bottom of the object, a layer of atmosphere like a force field is formed. # UAP The actual color of the UAP shot on Kodachrome film is unknown. This is because older scanners do not analyze Kodachrome. #UAP announced by the US Department of Defense A 35mm reversal image taken more clearly and three-dimensionally? Is it metallic and has a hollow structure in the center? A streak pattern can be seen on the body of the object. https://youtu.be/y0i-PLDyMBQ Obtained a higher resolution image than the UAP image announced by the US Department of Defense. If you analyze it a little more, you can expect new information. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ by the way・・ When the camera was still in the analog era Kodachrome film came out w I knew there was ... There was no film scanner. To be exact, There was no equipment that could color scan Kodachrome ww Recently ... At Amazon, a low-priced film scanner costs about 10,000 yen ... ww Even though it is a low-priced version, is it the same as the equipment for about 300,000 yen? Kodachrome is also properly color-corrected. In that Kodachrome, #UAP and #UFO But found ww When I shot it, I only thought about the moon in the daytime ... However, the color development is random ... Epson scan, when enlarged ... UFO is clear ... ww When I search on the net again ... I can't find the same type of UFO at all ww          #UAP in Spain 1995 Minolta Alpha Camera-Kodachrome film* The UFO was called #Flying Saucer, but this UAP is probably a #Flying Cup, no matter how you look at it. At the bottom of the object, a layer of atmosphere like a force field is formed. # UAP The actual color of the UAP shot on Kodachrome film is unknown. This is because older scanners do not analyze Kodachrome. #UAP announced by the US Department of Defense A 35mm reversal image taken more clearly and three-dimensionally? Is it metallic and has a hollow structure in the center? A streak pattern can be seen on the body of the object. https://youtu.be/y0i-PLDyMBQ Obtained a higher resolution image than the UAP image announced by the US Department of Defense. If you analyze it a little more, you can expect new information. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ by the way・・ When the camera was still in the analog era Kodachrome film came out w I knew there was ... There was no film scanner. To be exact, There was no equipment that could color scan Kodachrome ww Recently ... At Amazon, a low-priced film scanner costs about 10,000 yen ... ww Even though it is a low-priced version, is it the same as the equipment for about 300,000 yen? Kodachrome is also properly color-corrected. In that Kodachrome, #UAP and #UFO But found ww When I shot it, I only thought about the moon in the daytime ... However, the color development is random ... Epson scan, when enlarged ... UFO is clear ... ww When I search on the net again ... I can't find the same type of UFO at all ww     JazzGumPigmentPhotoStory1987-E-57  Analog pigment printing with monochrome negative film ... ww Speaking of vintage prints in the 1980's ... It was only about Kodak's ≪Die Transfer Print≫. However, even this is dyed, so there is no weatherability ... Then, after making the original by die transfer, ... Digital, pigment jet printing, enlarged copy, etc. Rough work came out, expensive, seems to be trade ww #UAP in Spain 1995 Minolta Alpha Camera-Kodachrome film* The UFO was called #Flying Saucer, but this UAP is probably a #Flying Cup, no matter how you look at it. At the bottom of the object, a layer of atmosphere like a force field is formed. # UAP The actual color of the UAP shot on Kodachrome film is unknown. This is because older scanners do not analyze Kodachrome. #UAP announced by the US Department of Defense A 35mm reversal image taken more clearly and three-dimensionally? Is it metallic and has a hollow structure in the center? A streak pattern can be seen on the body of the object. https://youtu.be/y0i-PLDyMBQ Obtained a higher resolution image than the UAP image announced by the US Department of Defense. If you analyze it a little more, you can expect new information. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ by the way・・ When the camera was still in the analog era Kodachrome film came out w I knew there was ... There was no film scanner. To be exact, There was no equipment that could color scan Kodachrome ww Recently ... At Amazon, a low-priced film scanner costs about 10,000 yen ... ww Even though it is a low-priced version, is it the same as the equipment for about 300,000 yen? Kodachrome is also properly color-corrected. In that Kodachrome, #UAP and #UFO But found ww When I shot it, I only thought about the moon in the daytime ... However, the color development is random ... Epson scan, when enlarged ... UFO is clear ... ww When I search on the net again ... I can't find the same type of UFO at all ww JazzPigmentPrint Development as an art work. The original is a small analog work, but This is enlarged and output to make a large work. That is ... I also developed this analog pigment print ... If pigment jet printing is done ... for a considerable price ... www Well, if there is demand ... but it is Tarareba ... ・ ww  “External ELF magnetic fields induce electric fields and currents in the body, but their strength is very high. High to cause nerve and muscle stimulation and central nervous system excitability changes. "In other words, when the signal gets stronger ... the investor mind is stimulated." ＄＄＄＄＄＄＄＄   At the time of # 1985, the Canon monochrome copier had color toner, but unfortunately, Since Y color toner was not on sale, color copying could not be realized. Therefore, 3-color photographic emulsion was made and 3-color printing was realized with 3-color photographic paper. After this, Bk color and Bk photographic emulsion were also completed, and full color printing was possible.   n#UAP in Spain 1995 Minolta Alpha Camera-Kodachrome film* The UFO was called #Flying Saucer, but this UAP is probably a #Flying Cup, no matter how you look at it. At the bottom of the object, a layer of atmosphere like a force field is formed. # UAP The actual color of the UAP shot on Kodachrome film is unknown. This is because older scanners do not analyze Kodachrome. #UAP announced by the US Department of Defense A 35mm reversal image taken more clearly and three-dimensionally? Is it metallic and has a hollow structure in the center? A streak pattern can be seen on the body of the object. https://youtu.be/y0i-PLDyMBQ Obtained a higher resolution image than the UAP image announced by the US Department of Defense. If you analyze it a little more, you can expect new information. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ by the way・・ When the camera was still in the analog era Kodachrome film came out w I knew there was ... There was no film scanner. To be exact, There was no equipment that could color scan Kodachrome ww Recently ... At Amazon, a low-priced film scanner costs about 10,000 yen ... ww Even though it is a low-priced version, is it the same as the equipment for about 300,000 yen? Kodachrome is also properly color-corrected. In that Kodachrome, #UAP and #UFO But found ww When I shot it, I only thought about the moon in the daytime ... However, the color development is random ... Epson scan, when enlarged ... UFO is clear ... ww When I search on the net again ... I can't find the same type of UFO at all ww +++++++++++++++++++++   |
フリーエリア
最新CM
[11/25 Jessebeimb]
[11/24 топ онлайн казино]
[11/18 Бездепозитные бонусы]
[11/18 Jessebeimb]
[11/16 Altonsaict]
最新記事
(11/25)
(11/24)
(11/24)
(11/23)
(11/23)
最新TB
プロフィール
ＨＮ：
dreamman
性別：
非公開
バーコード
ブログ内検索
アーカイブ
最古記事
(10/16)
(10/16)
(10/16)
(10/16)
(10/16) |
