#UAP in Spain 1995 Minolta Alpha Camera-Kodachrome film*
The UFO was called #Flying Saucer, but this UAP is probably a #Flying Cup, no matter how you look at it.
At the bottom of the object, a layer of atmosphere like a force field is formed. # UAP
The actual color of the UAP shot on Kodachrome film is unknown. This is because older scanners do not analyze Kodachrome.
#UAP announced by the US Department of Defense A 35mm reversal image taken more clearly and three-dimensionally? Is it metallic and has a hollow structure in the center? A streak pattern can be seen on the body of the object. https://youtu.be/y0i-PLDyMBQ
Obtained a higher resolution image than the UAP image announced by the US Department of Defense. If you analyze it a little more, you can expect new information.
The building at the UAP shooting site is in focus. UAP is the next distance, and it fits perfectly, but when expanded, is it due to Forcefield? A fog of the same type can be seen around the UAP.
Thank you for {Like}. This photo is like a “coloring page”, printed from a single negative film on a multicolor photo. Apply 4 or more pigment sensitizers on paper and repeat baking and development to complete.
Obtained a higher resolution image than the UAP image announced by the US Department of Defense. If you analyze it a little more, you can expect new information.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ by the way・・ When the camera was still in the analog era Kodachrome film came out w I knew there was ... There was no film scanner. To be exact, There was no equipment that could color scan Kodachrome ww Recently ... At Amazon, a low-priced film scanner costs about 10,000 yen ... ww Even though it is a low-priced version, is it the same as the equipment for about 300,000 yen? Kodachrome is also properly color-corrected.
In that Kodachrome, #UAP and #UFO But found ww When I shot it, I only thought about the moon in the daytime ... However, the color development is random ... Epson scan, when enlarged ... UFO is clear ... ww When I search on the net again ... I can't find the same type of UFO at all ww ++++++++++++++++++++++++ The fact that the United States has approved UAP means that manned UAP may have been successful, that is, it is meaningless to carry out the Artemis program, which allows it to pass through the Van Allen belt unscathed.
++++++++++++++++++++++++ Landing a NASA-developed UAP on an asteroid, using gravity lessen or gyro navigation to deflect its orbit or make a soft landing on any surface? In other words, can you develop planetary resources? ++++++++++++++++++++++++
UAP that can realize a planetary missile that can be guided to any point on the earth
In fact, unidentified flying objects, UAPs, etc. in books are not captured in the photographs. U.S. Navy UAP data may have been tampered with? *************************** Is the real UAP image not coming out because the Pentagon is buying it? If so, will this image be bought for $ 100,000? Please pay by Paypal for the transfer.
***************************
Most UFO research groups around the world may be fake. I don't even have a realistic photo of a UFO.
Most UFO Sites Don't Believe In UFOs? Even if you look at a realistic UAP image, there is no reaction at all? Doesn't even the Pentagon have realistic UAP images?
************************ If dark energy is put into practical use before 2030, will the future be harsh unless we take into consideration that gas energy will almost never be used? Is the United States the top in terms of basic patents? Will it be put into practical use in 2025? Is the UAP information disclosure by the US Department of Defense part of that?
Are unidentified flying objects under blackout worldwide? Are authorities repeatedly hiding information? Is it just light or ghosts that are reported? Why don't everyone shoot when they have a camera?
Thank you for {Like}. This photo is like a “coloring page”, printed from a single negative film on a multicolor photo. Apply 4 or more pigment sensitizers on paper and repeat baking and development to complete.
#UAP in Spain 1995 Minolta Alpha Camera-Kodachrome film*
The UFO was called #Flying Saucer, but this UAP is probably a #Flying Cup, no matter how you look at it.
At the bottom of the object, a layer of atmosphere like a force field is formed. # UAP
The actual color of the UAP shot on Kodachrome film is unknown. This is because older scanners do not analyze Kodachrome.
#UAP announced by the US Department of Defense A 35mm reversal image taken more clearly and three-dimensionally? Is it metallic and has a hollow structure in the center? A streak pattern can be seen on the body of the object. https://youtu.be/y0i-PLDyMBQ
Obtained a higher resolution image than the UAP image announced by the US Department of Defense. If you analyze it a little more, you can expect new information.
The building at the UAP shooting site is in focus. UAP is the next distance, and it fits perfectly, but when expanded, is it due to Forcefield? A fog of the same type can be seen around the UAP.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ UFOs are difficult to see with the naked eye, but film cameras are
sensitive to the infrared region, so they can be photographed. UFOs usually travel in the infrared region. And you can see the body in
the magnetic force field. ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ In the age of film cameras, UFOs could be photographed, Is it no longer
possible to shoot UFOs with digital cameras? That's because digital
cameras are equipped with powerful IR cut filters. ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ ******************************************** ついに、UFO構造物の原理が発見される? 「光で検出できない“不可視な”円柱構造 光や電磁波を反射や散乱しない構造を単一物質で実現 | 東工大ニュース | 東京工業大学 https://titech.ac.jp/news/2019/044158」 ********************************************* 撮影したUFOの構造が、パイプ状だったので、不思議だと思っていた・・・・・ しかし、2019年ごろのニュースで、 それが、「光で検出できない“不可視な”円柱構造 光や電磁波を反射や散乱しない構造」と判明? これで、撮影したUFOが、信ぴょう性のあるものとして証明できたかもしれない?
Thank you for {Like}. This photo is like a “coloring page”, printed from a single negative film on a multicolor photo. Apply 4 or more pigment sensitizers on paper and repeat baking and development to complete.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ by the way・・ When the camera was still in the analog era Kodachrome film came out w I knew there was ... There was no film scanner. To be exact, There was no equipment that could color scan Kodachrome ww Recently ... At Amazon, a low-priced film scanner costs about 10,000 yen ... ww Even though it is a low-priced version, is it the same as the equipment for about 300,000 yen? Kodachrome is also properly color-corrected.
In that Kodachrome, #UAP and #UFO But found ww When I shot it, I only thought about the moon in the daytime ... However, the color development is random ... Epson scan, when enlarged ... UFO is clear ... ww When I search on the net again ... I can't find the same type of UFO at all ww ++++++++++++++++++++++++ The fact that the United States has approved UAP means that manned UAP may have been successful, that is, it is meaningless to carry out the Artemis program, which allows it to pass through the Van Allen belt unscathed.
++++++++++++++++++++++++ Landing a NASA-developed UAP on an asteroid, using gravity lessen or gyro navigation to deflect its orbit or make a soft landing on any surface? In other words, can you develop planetary resources? ++++++++++++++++++++++++
UAP that can realize a planetary missile that can be guided to any point on the earth
In fact, unidentified flying objects, UAPs, etc. in books are not captured in the photographs. U.S. Navy UAP data may have been tampered with? *************************** Is the real UAP image not coming out because the Pentagon is buying it? If so, will this image be bought for $ 100,000? Please pay by Paypal for the transfer.
***************************
Most UFO research groups around the world may be fake. I don't even have a realistic photo of a UFO.
Most UFO Sites Don't Believe In UFOs? Even if you look at a realistic UAP image, there is no reaction at all? Doesn't even the Pentagon have realistic UAP images? $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Early satellites could not avoid persistent cloud cover. Similarly,
UFOs are hidden behind persistent cloud cover. However, in daylight,
the entity can sometimes be seen through.
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ UFOs are difficult to see with the naked eye, but film cameras are
sensitive to the infrared region, so they can be photographed. UFOs usually travel in the infrared region. And you can see the body in
Analog pigment printing with monochrome negative film ... ww Speaking of vintage prints in the 1980's ... It was only about Kodak's ≪Die Transfer Print≫. However, even this is dyed, so there is no weatherability ... Then, after making the original by die transfer, ... Digital, pigment jet printing, enlarged copy, etc. Rough work came out, expensive, seems to be trade ww JazzPigmentPrint Development as an art work.
#UAP in Spain 1995 Minolta Alpha Camera-Kodachrome film*
The UFO was called #Flying Saucer, but this UAP is probably a #Flying Cup, no matter how you look at it.
At the bottom of the object, a layer of atmosphere like a force field is formed. # UAP
The actual color of the UAP shot on Kodachrome film is unknown. This is because older scanners do not analyze Kodachrome.
#UAP announced by the US Department of Defense A 35mm reversal image taken more clearly and three-dimensionally? Is it metallic and has a hollow structure in the center? A streak pattern can be seen on the body of the object.
Obtained a higher resolution image than the UAP image announced by the US Department of Defense. If you analyze it a little more, you can expect new information.
The building at the UAP shooting site is in focus. UAP is the next distance, and it fits perfectly, but when expanded, is it due to Forcefield? A fog of the same type can be seen around the UAP. ******************************************** ついに、UFO構造物の原理が発見される? 「光で検出できない“不可視な”円柱構造 光や電磁波を反射や散乱しない構造を単一物質で実現 | 東工大ニュース | 東京工業大学 https://titech.ac.jp/news/2019/044158」 ********************************************* 撮影したUFOの構造が、パイプ状だったので、不思議だと思っていた・・・・・ しかし、2019年ごろのニュースで、 それが、「光で検出できない“不可視な”円柱構造 光や電磁波を反射や散乱しない構造」と判明? これで、撮影したUFOが、信ぴょう性のあるものとして証明できたかもしれない?
Thank you for {Like}. This photo is like a “coloring page”, printed from a single negative film on a multicolor photo. Apply 4 or more pigment sensitizers on paper and repeat baking and development to complete.